UNATEGO JUNIOR-SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DATA

2016-17

2015-16

Archive

STUDENT DATA

Enrollment Data

SCHOOL DATA

School Report Card

High School Graduation Rate

High School Graduation Pathways Data

EDUCATOR DATA

Annual Professional Performance Review Ratings - Education Law §3012-c

State-Provided Growth Ratings

STUDENT DATA

Enrollment Data

SCHOOL DATA

School Report Card

High School Graduation Rate

Please wait while we create your PDF.

Save as PDF

MY COMPARISONS

You currently have nothing selected for comparison. Click the + icon below to add this school for comparison.

How do comparisons work?

QUICK COMPARISONS

COMPARE WITH LAST YEAR

COMPARE WITH OTEGO-UNADILLA CSD

COMPARE WITH OTSEGO COUNTY

COMPARE WITH NY STATE

COUNTIES

BOCES

DISTRICTS

SCHOOLS

HIGHER EDUCATION

DOWNLOADS

COUNTIES

BOCES

DISTRICTS

SCHOOLS

HIGHER EDUCATION

DOWNLOADS

New York State

OTSEGO COUNTY

OTEGO-UNADILLA CSD

UNATEGO JUNIOR-SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

UNATEGO JUNIOR-SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL - School Report Card Data [2016 - 17]

The New York State Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents' effort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on school/district enrollment and staff, student performance, and other measures of school and district performance. Knowledge gained from the report card on a school's or district's strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and services to students.
Report Card Data - Glossary of Terms | Accountability Data - Glossary of Terms | Business Rules

What data would you like to see?

Profile Data

Enrollment

Average Class Size

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch

Attendance

Student Suspensions

Teacher Qualifications

Staff Counts

Outcomes

High School Completers

High School Non-Completers

Post-secondary Plans of Completers

Assessment Data

Total Cohort in Secondary-Level ELA, Math, Global History & Geography, U.S. History & Gov't, & Science

Regents Exams

Accountability Data

Secondary-Level English Language Arts

Secondary-Level Mathematics

Unweighted Combined PIs

Graduation Rate

UNATEGO JUNIOR-SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENROLLMENT (2016 - 17)

K-12 ENROLLMENT

264

ENROLLMENT BY GENDER

MALE

151

57%

FEMALE

113

43%

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY

GROUP

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

HISPANIC OR LATINO

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

WHITE

MULTIRACIAL

TOTAL

4

15

3

238

4

PERCENT

2%

6%

1%

90%

2%

OTHER GROUPS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

46

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

135

51%

ENROLLMENT BY GRADE

GROUP

9TH GRADE

10TH GRADE

11TH GRADE

12TH GRADE

TOTAL

65

75

65

59

PERCENT

25%

28%

25%

22%

UNATEGO JUNIOR-SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENROLLMENT (2016 - 17)

K-12 Enrollment: 264

ENROLLMENT BY GENDER

MALE

151

57%

FEMALE

113

43%

ENROLLMENT BY ETHNICITY

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

15

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

3

1%

WHITE

238

90%

MULTIRACIAL

4

2%

OTHER GROUPS

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

46

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

135

51%

ENROLLMENT BY GRADE

9TH GRADE

65

25%

10TH GRADE

75

28%

11TH GRADE

65

25%

12TH GRADE

59

22%

Average Class Size (2016 - 17)

GROUP

Grade 10 English

Grade 10 Social Studies

CLASS SIZE

19

18

Average Class Size (2016 - 17)

Grade 10 English

19

Grade 10 Social Studies

18

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2016 - 17)

ELIGIBLE FOR FREE LUNCH

97

37%

ELIGIBLE FOR REDUCED-PRICE LUNCH

28

11%

Free and Reduced-Price Lunch (2016 - 17)

Eligible for Free Lunch

97

37%

Eligible for Reduced-Price Lunch

28

11%

ATTENDANCE (2015 - 16)

ANNUAL ATTENDANCE RATE

92%

Attendance (2015 - 16)

Annual Attendance Rate

92%

STUDENT SUSPENSIONS (2015 - 16)

6

2%

Student Suspensions (2015 - 16)

Student Suspensions

6

2%

Staff Counts (2016 - 17)

GROUP

PRINCIPALS

ASSISTANT PRINCIPALS

OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF

PARAPROFESSIONALS

STAFF

1

0

2

0

Staff Counts (2016 - 17)

Principals

1

Assistant Principals

0

Other Professional Staff

2

Paraprofessionals

0

Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)

TOTAL TEACHERS

23

PERCENT WITH NO VALID TEACHING CERTIFICATE

0%

PERCENT TEACHING OUT OF CERTIFICATE

0%

PERCENT WITH FEWER THAN THREE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

13%

PERCENTAGE WITH MASTER'S DEGREEPLUS 30 HOURS OR DOCTORATE

13%

Total Number of Classes

96

Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification

0%

Teacher Qualifications (2016 - 17)

TOTAL TEACHERS: 23

Percent with No Valid Teaching Certificate

0%

Percent Teaching Out of Certification

0%

Percent with Fewer Than Three Years of Experience

13%

Percentage with Master's Degree Plus 30 Hours or Doctorate

13%

Total Number of Classes

96

Percent Taught by Teachers Without Appropriate Certification

0%

High School Completers (2016 - 17)

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

54

47

7

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

53

47

6

REGENTS DIPLOMA

49

92%

47

100%

2

33%

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

REGENTS WITH ADVANCED DESIGNATION

14

26%

14

30%

0

0%

REGENTS WITH CTE ENDORSEMENT

11

21%

10

21%

1

17%

LOCAL DIPLOMAS

4

8%

0

0%

4

67%

COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS

1

2%

0

0%

1

14%

All Students

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

54

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

53

Regents Diploma

49

92%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

14

26%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

11

21%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

4

8%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

1

2%

of Completers

General Education

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

47

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

47

Regents Diploma

47

100%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

14

30%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

10

21%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

0

0%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

0

0%

of Completers

Students with Disabilities

COMPLETERS (GRADUATES + COMMENCEMENT CREDENTIALS)

7

Graduates (Regents + Local Diplomas)

6

Regents Diploma

2

33%

of Graduates

Regents with Advanced Designation

0

0%

of Graduates

Regents with CTE Endorsement

1

17%

of Graduates

Local Diplomas

4

67%

of Graduates

Commencement Credentials

1

14%

of Completers

High School Non-completers (2016 - 17)

GROUP

All Students

General Education

DROPPED OUT

_

_

_

_

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_

_

_

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_

_

_

All Students

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

General Education

DROPPED OUT

_

_%

ENTERED APPROVED HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY PREPARATION PROGRAM

_

_%

TOTAL NONCOMPLETERS

_

_%

Post-graduation Plans of Completers (2016 - 17)

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

TO FOUR-YEAR COLLEGE

19

35%

18

38%

1

14%

TO TWO-YEAR COLLEGE

19

35%

18

38%

1

14%

TO OTHER POST-SECONDARY

2

4%

1

2%

1

14%

TO THE MILITARY

2

4%

2

4%

0

0%

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

TO EMPLOYMENT

9

17%

6

13%

3

43%

TO ADULT SERVICES

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

TO OTHER KNOWN PLANS

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

PLANS UNKNOWN

3

6%

2

4%

1

14%

All Students

To Four-Year College

19

35%

To Two-Year College

19

35%

To Other Post-Secondary

2

4%

To the Military

2

4%

To Employment

9

17%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

3

6%

General Education

To Four-Year College

18

38%

To Two-Year College

18

38%

To Other Post-Secondary

1

2%

To the Military

2

4%

To Employment

6

13%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

2

4%

Students with Disabilities

To Four-Year College

1

14%

To Two-Year College

1

14%

To Other Post-Secondary

1

14%

To the Military

0

0%

To Employment

3

43%

To Adult Services

0

0%

To Other Known Plans

0

0%

Plan Unknown

1

14%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English Language Arts after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

92%

TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

45

71%

General Education

PROFICIENT

96%

TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

43

81%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

70%

TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

93%

TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

40

70%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

83%

TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

5

83%

Female

PROFICIENT

92%

TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

21

84%

Male

PROFICIENT

92%

TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

24

63%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

92%

TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

45

71%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

83%

TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

19

63%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

100%

TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

26

79%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

92%

TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

45

71%

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

63

53

10

2

1

57

3

6

25

38

63

30

33

63

PROFICIENT

92%

96%

70%

_%

_%

93%

_%

83%

92%

92%

92%

83%

100%

92%

LEVEL 1

1

2%

0

0%

1

10%

_

_

_

_

1

2%

_

_

0

0%

1

4%

0

0%

1

2%

1

3%

0

0%

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

0

0%

1

10%

_

_

_

_

1

2%

_

_

0

0%

1

4%

0

0%

1

2%

1

3%

0

0%

1

2%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

8

15%

5

50%

_

_

_

_

13

23%

_

_

0

0%

2

8%

11

29%

13

21%

6

20%

7

21%

13

21%

LEVEL 4

45

71%

43

81%

2

20%

_

_

_

_

40

70%

_

_

5

83%

21

84%

24

63%

45

71%

19

63%

26

79%

45

71%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

90%

TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

50

79%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

General Education

PROFICIENT

98%

TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

45

85%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

50%

TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

89%

TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

46

81%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

100%

TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

Female

PROFICIENT

92%

TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

16

64%

LEVEL 4

7

28%

Male

PROFICIENT

89%

TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

34

89%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

90%

TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

50

79%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

80%

TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

22

73%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

100%

TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

28

85%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

90%

TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

50

79%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

63

53

10

2

1

57

3

6

25

38

63

30

33

63

PROFICIENT

90%

98%

50%

_%

_%

89%

_%

100%

92%

89%

90%

80%

100%

90%

LEVEL 1

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

0

0%

_

_

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

0

0%

3

30%

_

_

_

_

3

5%

_

_

0

0%

1

4%

2

5%

3

5%

3

10%

0

0%

3

5%

LEVEL 3

50

79%

45

85%

5

50%

_

_

_

_

46

81%

_

_

4

67%

16

64%

34

89%

50

79%

22

73%

28

85%

50

79%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

7

13%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

5

9%

_

_

2

33%

7

28%

0

0%

7

11%

2

7%

5

15%

7

11%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Global History and Geography after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

86%

TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

33

52%

LEVEL 4

21

33%

General Education

PROFICIENT

96%

TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

30

57%

LEVEL 4

21

40%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

30%

TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

86%

TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

29

51%

LEVEL 4

20

35%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

83%

TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Female

PROFICIENT

88%

TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

11

44%

LEVEL 4

11

44%

Male

PROFICIENT

84%

TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

22

58%

LEVEL 4

10

26%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

86%

TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

33

52%

LEVEL 4

21

33%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

73%

TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

16

53%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

97%

TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

17

52%

LEVEL 4

15

45%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

86%

TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

33

52%

LEVEL 4

21

33%

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

63

53

10

2

1

57

3

6

25

38

63

30

33

63

PROFICIENT

86%

96%

30%

_%

_%

86%

_%

83%

88%

84%

86%

73%

97%

86%

LEVEL 1

2

3%

0

0%

2

20%

_

_

_

_

2

4%

_

_

0

0%

2

8%

0

0%

2

3%

2

7%

0

0%

2

3%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

1

2%

4

40%

_

_

_

_

4

7%

_

_

1

17%

1

4%

4

11%

5

8%

4

13%

1

3%

5

8%

LEVEL 3

33

52%

30

57%

3

30%

_

_

_

_

29

51%

_

_

4

67%

11

44%

22

58%

33

52%

16

53%

17

52%

33

52%

LEVEL 4

21

33%

21

40%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

20

35%

_

_

1

17%

11

44%

10

26%

21

33%

6

20%

15

45%

21

33%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level U.S. History and Government after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

90%

TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

27

43%

LEVEL 4

30

48%

General Education

PROFICIENT

96%

TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

22

42%

LEVEL 4

29

55%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

60%

TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

91%

TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

25

44%

LEVEL 4

27

47%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

83%

TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

Female

PROFICIENT

92%

TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

15

60%

Male

PROFICIENT

89%

TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

19

50%

LEVEL 4

15

39%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

90%

TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

27

43%

LEVEL 4

30

48%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

80%

TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

11

37%

LEVEL 4

13

43%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

100%

TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

16

48%

LEVEL 4

17

52%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

90%

TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

27

43%

LEVEL 4

30

48%

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

63

53

10

2

1

57

3

6

25

38

63

30

33

63

PROFICIENT

90%

96%

60%

_%

_%

91%

_%

83%

92%

89%

90%

80%

100%

90%

LEVEL 1

1

2%

0

0%

1

10%

_

_

_

_

1

2%

_

_

0

0%

0

0%

1

3%

1

2%

1

3%

0

0%

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

0

0%

1

10%

_

_

_

_

1

2%

_

_

0

0%

1

4%

0

0%

1

2%

1

3%

0

0%

1

2%

LEVEL 3

27

43%

22

42%

5

50%

_

_

_

_

25

44%

_

_

2

33%

8

32%

19

50%

27

43%

11

37%

16

48%

27

43%

LEVEL 4

30

48%

29

55%

1

10%

_

_

_

_

27

47%

_

_

3

50%

15

60%

15

39%

30

48%

13

43%

17

52%

30

48%

Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Science after Four Years of Instruction

All Students

PROFICIENT

95%

TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

29

46%

LEVEL 4

31

49%

General Education

PROFICIENT

100%

TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

23

43%

LEVEL 4

30

57%

Students with Disabilities

PROFICIENT

70%

TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

6

60%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Black or African American

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 2

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Hispanic or Latino

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 1

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

White

PROFICIENT

95%

TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

27

47%

LEVEL 4

27

47%

Multiracial

PROFICIENT

_%

TOTAL TESTED: 3

LEVEL 1

_

_

LEVEL 2

_

_

LEVEL 3

_

_

LEVEL 4

_

_

Small Group Total

PROFICIENT

100%

TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

Female

PROFICIENT

92%

TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

13

52%

Male

PROFICIENT

97%

TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

19

50%

LEVEL 4

18

47%

Non-English Language Learners

PROFICIENT

95%

TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

29

46%

LEVEL 4

31

49%

Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

90%

TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

13

43%

LEVEL 4

14

47%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

PROFICIENT

100%

TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

16

48%

LEVEL 4

17

52%

Not Migrant

PROFICIENT

95%

TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

29

46%

LEVEL 4

31

49%

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

63

53

10

2

1

57

3

6

25

38

63

30

33

63

PROFICIENT

95%

100%

70%

_%

_%

95%

_%

100%

92%

97%

95%

90%

100%

95%

LEVEL 1

1

2%

0

0%

1

10%

_

_

_

_

1

2%

_

_

0

0%

1

4%

0

0%

1

2%

1

3%

0

0%

1

2%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

0

0%

1

10%

_

_

_

_

1

2%

_

_

0

0%

1

4%

0

0%

1

2%

1

3%

0

0%

1

2%

LEVEL 3

29

46%

23

43%

6

60%

_

_

_

_

27

47%

_

_

2

33%

10

40%

19

50%

29

46%

13

43%

16

48%

29

46%

LEVEL 4

31

49%

30

57%

1

10%

_

_

_

_

27

47%

_

_

4

67%

13

52%

18

47%

31

49%

14

47%

17

52%

31

49%

Regents Examination Results (2016 - 17)

English Language Arts (Common Core)

English Language Arts (Common Core)

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

68

55

13

2

1

5

58

2

5

27

41

68

30

38

68

LEVEL 1

1

1%

0

0%

1

8%

_

_

_

_

0

0%

1

2%

_

_

0

0%

0

0%

1

2%

1

1%

1

3%

0

0%

1

1%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

1

2%

3

23%

_

_

_

_

0

0%

4

7%

_

_

0

0%

4

15%

0

0%

4

6%

2

7%

2

5%

4

6%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

10

18%

7

54%

_

_

_

_

2

40%

14

24%

_

_

1

20%

7

26%

10

24%

17

25%

8

27%

9

24%

17

25%

LEVEL 4

15

22%

14

25%

1

8%

_

_

_

_

0

0%

13

22%

_

_

2

40%

7

26%

8

20%

15

22%

8

27%

7

18%

15

22%

LEVEL 5

31

46%

30

55%

1

8%

_

_

_

_

3

60%

26

45%

_

_

2

40%

9

33%

22

54%

31

46%

11

37%

20

53%

31

46%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 68

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

15

22%

LEVEL 5

31

46%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 55

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

14

25%

LEVEL 5

30

55%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 13

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

LEVEL 5

1

8%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

TOTAL TESTED: 2

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 5

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

3

60%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 58

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

13

22%

LEVEL 5

26

45%

Multiracial

TOTAL TESTED: 2

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 5

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

LEVEL 5

2

40%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 27

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

7

26%

LEVEL 5

9

33%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 41

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

8

20%

LEVEL 5

22

54%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 68

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

15

22%

LEVEL 5

31

46%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 30

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

8

27%

LEVEL 5

11

37%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 38

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

LEVEL 5

20

53%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 68

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

15

22%

LEVEL 5

31

46%

Algebra 2/Trigonometry

Regents Algebra 2/Trigonometry

GROUP

All Students

General Education

White

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

4

4

4

4

1

3

4

1

3

4

55

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

65

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

85

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 4

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 4

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 4

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 4

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 3

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 4

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 3

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 4

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Algebra I (Common Core)

Algebra I (Common Core)

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

72

56

16

1

6

64

1

8

33

39

72

42

30

72

LEVEL 1

2

3%

0

0%

2

13%

_

_

_

_

2

3%

_

_

0

0%

0

0%

2

5%

2

3%

2

5%

0

0%

2

3%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

4

7%

4

25%

_

_

_

_

8

13%

_

_

0

0%

3

9%

5

13%

8

11%

6

14%

2

7%

8

11%

LEVEL 3

40

56%

31

55%

9

56%

_

_

_

_

35

55%

_

_

5

63%

16

48%

24

62%

40

56%

21

50%

19

63%

40

56%

LEVEL 4

19

26%

18

32%

1

6%

_

_

_

_

16

25%

_

_

3

38%

11

33%

8

21%

19

26%

11

26%

8

27%

19

26%

LEVEL 5

3

4%

3

5%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

3

5%

_

_

0

0%

3

9%

0

0%

3

4%

2

5%

1

3%

3

4%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 72

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

40

56%

LEVEL 4

19

26%

LEVEL 5

3

4%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 56

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

31

55%

LEVEL 4

18

32%

LEVEL 5

3

5%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 16

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

9

56%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 6

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 64

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

35

55%

LEVEL 4

16

25%

LEVEL 5

3

5%

Multiracial

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 8

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 33

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

16

48%

LEVEL 4

11

33%

LEVEL 5

3

9%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 39

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

24

62%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 72

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

40

56%

LEVEL 4

19

26%

LEVEL 5

3

4%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 42

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

21

50%

LEVEL 4

11

26%

LEVEL 5

2

5%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 30

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

19

63%

LEVEL 4

8

27%

LEVEL 5

1

3%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 72

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

40

56%

LEVEL 4

19

26%

LEVEL 5

3

4%

Common Core Geometry

Regents Common Core Geometry

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

White

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

40

40

1

1

38

40

24

16

40

21

19

40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

2

5%

_

_

_

_

_

_

2

5%

1

4%

1

6%

2

5%

1

5%

1

5%

2

5%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

9

23%

_

_

_

_

_

_

9

23%

5

21%

4

25%

9

23%

5

24%

4

21%

9

23%

LEVEL 3

24

60%

24

60%

_

_

_

_

_

_

24

60%

14

58%

10

63%

24

60%

14

67%

10

53%

24

60%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

1

3%

_

_

_

_

_

_

1

3%

1

4%

0

0%

1

3%

1

5%

0

0%

1

3%

LEVEL 5

4

10%

4

10%

_

_

_

_

_

_

4

10%

3

13%

1

6%

4

10%

0

0%

4

21%

4

10%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 40

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

24

60%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

LEVEL 5

4

10%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 40

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

24

60%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

LEVEL 5

4

10%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 38

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 40

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

24

60%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

LEVEL 5

4

10%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 24

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

14

58%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

LEVEL 5

3

13%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 16

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

10

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

1

6%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 40

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

24

60%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

LEVEL 5

4

10%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 21

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

14

67%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 19

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

10

53%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

4

21%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 40

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

24

60%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

LEVEL 5

4

10%

Algebra II (Common Core)

Algebra II (Common Core)

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Hispanic or Latino

White

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

26

26

3

23

26

9

17

26

7

19

26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

6

23%

_

_

_

_

6

23%

2

22%

4

24%

6

23%

2

29%

4

21%

6

23%

LEVEL 3

17

65%

17

65%

_

_

_

_

17

65%

7

78%

10

59%

17

65%

5

71%

12

63%

17

65%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

2

8%

_

_

_

_

2

8%

0

0%

2

12%

2

8%

0

0%

2

11%

2

8%

LEVEL 5

1

4%

1

4%

_

_

_

_

1

4%

0

0%

1

6%

1

4%

0

0%

1

5%

1

4%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 26

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

17

65%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

LEVEL 5

1

4%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 26

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

17

65%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

LEVEL 5

1

4%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 3

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 23

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

_

_%

LEVEL 2

_

_%

LEVEL 3

_

_%

LEVEL 4

_

_%

LEVEL 5

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 26

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

17

65%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

LEVEL 5

1

4%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 9

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

7

78%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 17

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

10

59%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

LEVEL 5

1

6%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 26

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

17

65%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

LEVEL 5

1

4%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 7

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

LEVEL 5

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 19

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

12

63%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

LEVEL 5

1

5%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 26

Number/Percent scoring at

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

17

65%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

LEVEL 5

1

4%

Global History and Geography

Regents Global History and Geography

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

White

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

73

61

12

1

3

69

73

32

41

73

45

28

73

55

66

90%

59

97%

7

58%

_

_

_

_

_

_

66

90%

28

88%

38

93%

66

90%

40

89%

26

93%

66

90%

65

58

79%

53

87%

5

42%

_

_

_

_

_

_

58

79%

23

72%

35

85%

58

79%

34

76%

24

86%

58

79%

85

25

34%

25

41%

0

0%

_

_

_

_

_

_

25

34%

7

22%

18

44%

25

34%

14

31%

11

39%

25

34%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 73

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

66

90%

65

58

79%

85

25

34%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 61

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

59

97%

65

53

87%

85

25

41%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 12

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

7

58%

65

5

42%

85

0

0%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 3

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 69

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 73

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

66

90%

65

58

79%

85

25

34%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 32

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

28

88%

65

23

72%

85

7

22%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 41

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

38

93%

65

35

85%

85

18

44%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 73

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

66

90%

65

58

79%

85

25

34%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 45

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

40

89%

65

34

76%

85

14

31%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 28

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

26

93%

65

24

86%

85

11

39%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 73

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

66

90%

65

58

79%

85

25

34%

U.S. History & Government

Regents U.S. History & Government

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

64

53

11

2

1

5

54

2

5

24

40

64

26

38

64

55

63

98%

53

100%

10

91%

_

_

_

_

5

100%

53

98%

_

_

5

100%

23

96%

40

100%

63

98%

26

100%

37

97%

63

98%

65

60

94%

51

96%

9

82%

_

_

_

_

5

100%

50

93%

_

_

5

100%

21

88%

39

98%

60

94%

23

88%

37

97%

60

94%

85

32

50%

31

58%

1

9%

_

_

_

_

4

80%

27

50%

_

_

1

20%

7

29%

25

63%

32

50%

10

38%

22

58%

32

50%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 64

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

63

98%

65

60

94%

85

32

50%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 53

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

53

100%

65

51

96%

85

31

58%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 11

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

10

91%

65

9

82%

85

1

9%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

TOTAL TESTED: 2

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 5

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

5

100%

65

5

100%

85

4

80%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 54

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

53

98%

65

50

93%

85

27

50%

Multiracial

TOTAL TESTED: 2

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 5

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

5

100%

65

5

100%

85

1

20%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 24

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

23

96%

65

21

88%

85

7

29%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 40

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

40

100%

65

39

98%

85

25

63%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 64

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

63

98%

65

60

94%

85

32

50%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 26

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

26

100%

65

23

88%

85

10

38%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 38

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

37

97%

65

37

97%

85

22

58%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 64

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

63

98%

65

60

94%

85

32

50%

Living Environment

Regents Living Environment

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

42

31

11

1

5

35

1

7

18

24

42

24

18

42

55

41

98%

31

100%

10

91%

_

_

_

_

34

97%

_

_

7

100%

18

100%

23

96%

41

98%

23

96%

18

100%

41

98%

65

35

83%

29

94%

6

55%

_

_

_

_

29

83%

_

_

6

86%

16

89%

19

79%

35

83%

18

75%

17

94%

35

83%

85

8

19%

7

23%

1

9%

_

_

_

_

7

20%

_

_

1

14%

4

22%

4

17%

8

19%

4

17%

4

22%

8

19%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 42

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

41

98%

65

35

83%

85

8

19%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 31

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

31

100%

65

29

94%

85

7

23%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 11

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

10

91%

65

6

55%

85

1

9%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 5

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 35

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

34

97%

65

29

83%

85

7

20%

Multiracial

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 7

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

7

100%

65

6

86%

85

1

14%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 18

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

18

100%

65

16

89%

85

4

22%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 24

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

23

96%

65

19

79%

85

4

17%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 42

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

41

98%

65

35

83%

85

8

19%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 24

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

23

96%

65

18

75%

85

4

17%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 18

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

18

100%

65

17

94%

85

4

22%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 42

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

41

98%

65

35

83%

85

8

19%

Physical Setting/Earth Science

Regents Physical Setting/Earth Science

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Students with Disabilities

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

74

63

11

1

1

4

67

1

7

39

35

74

44

30

74

55

67

91%

60

95%

7

64%

_

_

_

_

_

_

61

91%

_

_

6

86%

33

85%

34

97%

67

91%

38

86%

29

97%

67

91%

65

63

85%

57

90%

6

55%

_

_

_

_

_

_

57

85%

_

_

6

86%

30

77%

33

94%

63

85%

36

82%

27

90%

63

85%

85

27

36%

26

41%

1

9%

_

_

_

_

_

_

23

34%

_

_

4

57%

13

33%

14

40%

27

36%

15

34%

12

40%

27

36%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 74

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

67

91%

65

63

85%

85

27

36%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 63

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

60

95%

65

57

90%

85

26

41%

Students with Disabilities

TOTAL TESTED: 11

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

7

64%

65

6

55%

85

1

9%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 4

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 67

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

61

91%

65

57

85%

85

23

34%

Multiracial

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 7

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

6

86%

65

6

86%

85

4

57%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 39

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

33

85%

65

30

77%

85

13

33%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 35

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

34

97%

65

33

94%

85

14

40%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 74

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

67

91%

65

63

85%

85

27

36%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 44

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

38

86%

65

36

82%

85

15

34%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 30

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

29

97%

65

27

90%

85

12

40%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 74

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

67

91%

65

63

85%

85

27

36%

Physical Setting/Chemistry

Regents Physical Setting/Chemistry

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Hispanic or Latino

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

35

35

1

4

29

1

6

14

21

35

16

19

35

55

32

91%

32

91%

_

_

_

_

26

90%

_

_

6

100%

13

93%

19

90%

32

91%

14

88%

18

95%

32

91%

65

20

57%

20

57%

_

_

_

_

16

55%

_

_

4

67%

5

36%

15

71%

20

57%

7

44%

13

68%

20

57%

85

2

6%

2

6%

_

_

_

_

0

0%

_

_

2

33%

0

0%

2

10%

2

6%

0

0%

2

11%

2

6%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 35

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

32

91%

65

20

57%

85

2

6%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 35

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

32

91%

65

20

57%

85

2

6%

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Hispanic or Latino

TOTAL TESTED: 4

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 29

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

26

90%

65

16

55%

85

0

0%

Multiracial

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 6

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

6

100%

65

4

67%

85

2

33%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 14

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

13

93%

65

5

36%

85

0

0%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 21

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

19

90%

65

15

71%

85

2

10%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 35

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

32

91%

65

20

57%

85

2

6%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 16

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

14

88%

65

7

44%

85

0

0%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 19

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

18

95%

65

13

68%

85

2

11%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 35

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

32

91%

65

20

57%

85

2

6%

Physical Setting/Physics

Regents Physical Setting/Physics

GROUP

All Students

General Education

Black or African American

White

Multiracial

Small Group Total

Female

Male

Non-English Language Learners

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED

20

20

1

18

1

20

7

13

20

8

12

20

55

19

95%

19

95%

_

_

_

_

_

_

19

95%

6

86%

13

100%

19

95%

7

88%

12

100%

19

95%

65

17

85%

17

85%

_

_

_

_

_

_

17

85%

5

71%

12

92%

17

85%

6

75%

11

92%

17

85%

85

5

25%

5

25%

_

_

_

_

_

_

5

25%

1

14%

4

31%

5

25%

2

25%

3

25%

5

25%

All Students

TOTAL TESTED: 20

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

19

95%

65

17

85%

85

5

25%

General Education

TOTAL TESTED: 20

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

19

95%

65

17

85%

85

5

25%

Black or African American

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

White

TOTAL TESTED: 18

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Multiracial

TOTAL TESTED: 1

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

_

_%

65

_

_%

85

_

_%

Small Group Total

TOTAL TESTED: 20

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

19

95%

65

17

85%

85

5

25%

Female

TOTAL TESTED: 7

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

6

86%

65

5

71%

85

1

14%

Male

TOTAL TESTED: 13

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

13

100%

65

12

92%

85

4

31%

Non-English Language Learners

TOTAL TESTED: 20

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

19

95%

65

17

85%

85

5

25%

Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 8

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

7

88%

65

6

75%

85

2

25%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

TOTAL TESTED: 12

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

12

100%

65

11

92%

85

3

25%

Not Migrant

TOTAL TESTED: 20

Number/Percent scoring at or above

55

19

95%

65

17

85%

85

5

25%

Secondary-Level English Language Arts Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: YES

GROUP

All Students

American Indian or Alaska Native

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

White

Multiracial

Students With Disabilities

Limited English Proficient

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

―

Tested 95%

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

―

12th graders

56

0

1

0

0

53

2

7

0

23

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

―

―

―

―

100%

―

―

―

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

59

0

2

1

0

55

1

9

0

26

PI

168

―

―

―

―

169

―

―

―

―

EAMO

165

―

―

―

―

173

―

―

―

―

Safe Harbor Target

162

―

―

―

―

164

―

―

―

―

All Students

MADE AYP: YES

Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

56

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

59

PI

168

EAMO

165

Safe Harbor Target

162

American Indian or Alaska Native

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Black or African American

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

1

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

2

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Hispanic or Latino

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

1

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

White

MADE AYP: YES

Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

53

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

55

PI

169

EAMO

173

Safe Harbor Target

164

Multiracial

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

2

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

1

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Students With Disabilities

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

7

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

9

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Limited English Proficient

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

23

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

26

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP

Not American Indian or Alaska Native

Not Black or African American

Not Hispanic or Latino

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Not White

Not Multiracial

General Education

English Proficient

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Male

Female

Migrant

Not Migrant

12th Graders

56

55

56

56

3

54

49

56

33

35

21

0

56

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

100%

100%

100%

―

100%

100%

100%

―

―

―

―

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

59

57

58

59

4

58

50

59

33

35

24

0

59

PI

168

170

167

168

―

167

180

168

179

163

―

―

168

Not American Indian or Alaska Native

12th Graders

56

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

59

PI

168

Not Black or African American

12th Graders

55

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

57

PI

170

Not Hispanic or Latino

12th Graders

56

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

58

PI

167

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

12th Graders

56

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

59

PI

168

Not White

12th Graders

3

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

4

PI

―

Not Multiracial

12th Graders

54

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

58

PI

167

General Education

12th Graders

49

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

50

PI

180

English Proficient

12th Graders

56

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

59

PI

168

Not Economically Disadvantaged

12th Graders

33

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

33

PI

179

Male

12th Graders

35

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

35

PI

163

Female

12th Graders

21

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

24

PI

―

Migrant

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

―

Not Migrant

12th Graders

56

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

59

PI

168

― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.

Secondary-Level Mathematics Results for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: NO

GROUP

All Students

American Indian or Alaska Native

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

White

Multiracial

Students With Disabilities

Limited English Proficient

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP

YES

―

―

―

―

NO

―

―

―

―

Tested 95%

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

―

12th graders

56

0

1

0

0

53

2

7

0

23

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

―

―

―

―

100%

―

―

―

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

―

―

―

―

NO

―

―

―

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

59

0

2

1

0

55

1

9

0

26

PI

127

―

―

―

―

125

―

―

―

―

EAMO

152

―

―

―

―

162

―

―

―

―

Safe Harbor Target

127

―

―

―

―

127

―

―

―

―

All Students

MADE AYP: YES

Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

56

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

YES

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

59

PI

127

EAMO

152

Safe Harbor Target

127

American Indian or Alaska Native

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Black or African American

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

1

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

2

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Hispanic or Latino

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

1

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

White

MADE AYP: NO

Tested 95%

YES

12th Graders

53

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

NO

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

55

PI

125

EAMO

162

Safe Harbor Target

127

Multiracial

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

2

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

1

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Students With Disabilities

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

7

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

9

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Limited English Proficient

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP: ―

Tested 95%

―

12th Graders

23

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

PI >= EAMO or Safe Harbor Target

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

26

PI

―

EAMO

―

Safe Harbor Target

―

Results for the following groups are NOT used to determine AYP.

GROUP

Not American Indian or Alaska Native

Not Black or African American

Not Hispanic or Latino

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Not White

Not Multiracial

General Education

English Proficient

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Male

Female

Migrant

Not Migrant

12th Graders

56

55

56

56

3

54

49

56

33

35

21

0

56

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

100%

100%

100%

―

100%

100%

100%

―

―

―

―

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

59

57

58

59

4

58

50

59

33

35

24

0

59

PI

127

126

128

127

―

126

140

127

142

114

―

―

127

Not American Indian or Alaska Native

12th Graders

56

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

59

PI

127

Not Black or African American

12th Graders

55

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

57

PI

126

Not Hispanic or Latino

12th Graders

56

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

58

PI

128

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

12th Graders

56

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

59

PI

127

Not White

12th Graders

3

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

4

PI

―

Not Multiracial

12th Graders

54

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

58

PI

126

General Education

12th Graders

49

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

50

PI

140

English Proficient

12th Graders

56

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

59

PI

127

Not Economically Disadvantaged

12th Graders

33

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

33

PI

142

Male

12th Graders

35

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

35

PI

114

Female

12th Graders

21

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

24

PI

―

Migrant

12th Graders

0

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

―

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

0

PI

―

Not Migrant

12th Graders

56

Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores

100%

2013 Accountability Cohort Members

59

PI

127

― There were fewer than 40 12th graders, so the Percent of 12th Graders with Valid Test Scores data are suppressed OR there were fewer than 30 students in the 2013 accountability cohort, so PI, EAMO, and Safe Harbor Target data are suppressed.

Unweighted Combined ELA and Math PIs

GROUP

All Students

American Indian or Alaska Native

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

White

Multiracial

Students With Disabilities

Limited English Proficient

Economically Disadvantaged

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

―

―

―

―

―

―

―

―

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

―

―

―

―

―

―

―

―

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

168

―

―

―

―

169

―

―

―

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

127

―

―

―

―

125

―

―

―

―

UNWEIGHTED COMBINED PI

148

0

0

0

0

147

0

0

0

0

All Students

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

168

Secondary-Level MATH PI

127

Unweighted Combined PI

148

American Indian or Alaska Native

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

0

Black or African American

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

0

Hispanic or Latino

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

0

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

0

White

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

169

Secondary-Level MATH PI

125

Unweighted Combined PI

147

Multiracial

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

0

Students With Disabilities

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

0

Limited English Proficient

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

0

Economically Disadvantaged

Elementary/ Middle-Level ELA PI

―

Elementary/ Middle-Level MATH PI

―

Secondary-Level ELA PI

―

Secondary-Level MATH PI

―

Unweighted Combined PI

0

― There were not enough students to determine a Performance Index.

Overall Graduation Rate for Accountability

All accountability groups made AYP: YES

GROUP

All Students

American Indian or Alaska Native

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

White

Multiracial

Students With Disabilities

Limited English Proficient

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

YES

All Students

MADE AYP

YES

American Indian or Alaska Native

MADE AYP

―

Black or African American

MADE AYP

―

Hispanic or Latino

MADE AYP

―

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

MADE AYP

―

White

MADE AYP

YES

Multiracial

MADE AYP

―

Students With Disabilities

MADE AYP

―

Limited English Proficient

MADE AYP

―

Economically Disadvantaged

MADE AYP

YES

― There were not enough students to make an AYP determination.

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability

GROUP

All Students

American Indian or Alaska Native

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

White

Multiracial

Students With Disabilities

Limited English Proficient

Economically Disadvantaged

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

NO

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

83

0

1

3

1

78

0

14

0

37

Graduation Rate

87%

―

―

―

―

88%

―

―

―

76%

State Standard

80%

―

―

―

―

80%

―

―

―

80%

Progress Target

80%

―

―

―

―

80%

―

―

―

80%

All Students

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

83

Graduation Rate

87%

State Standard

80%

Progress Target

80%

American Indian or Alaska Native

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

0

Graduation Rate

―

State Standard

―

Progress Target

―

Black or African American

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

1

Graduation Rate

―

State Standard

―

Progress Target

―

Hispanic or Latino

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

3

Graduation Rate

―

State Standard

―

Progress Target

―

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

1

Graduation Rate

―

State Standard

―

Progress Target

―

White

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

78

Graduation Rate

88%

State Standard

80%

Progress Target

80%

Multiracial

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

0

Graduation Rate

―

State Standard

―

Progress Target

―

Students With Disabilities

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

14

Graduation Rate

―

State Standard

―

Progress Target

―

Limited English Proficient

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

0

Graduation Rate

―

State Standard

―

Progress Target

―

Economically Disadvantaged

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: NO

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

37

Graduation Rate

76%

State Standard

80%

Progress Target

80%

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.
NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort for Accountability

GROUP

All Students

American Indian or Alaska Native

Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

White

Multiracial

Students With Disabilities

Limited English Proficient

Economically Disadvantaged

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion:

YES

―

―

―

―

YES

―

―

―

YES

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

65

0

0

1

0

64

0

4

0

33

Graduation Rate

98%

―

―

―

―

98%

―

―

―

97%

State Standard

80%

―

―

―

―

80%

―

―

―

80%

Progress Target

80%

―

―

―

―

80%

―

―

―

78%

All Students

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

65

Graduation Rate

98%

State Standard

80%

Progress Target

80%

American Indian or Alaska Native

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

0

Graduation Rate

―

State Standard

―

Progress Target

―

Black or African American

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

0

Graduation Rate

―

State Standard

―

Progress Target

―

Hispanic or Latino

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

1

Graduation Rate

―

State Standard

―

Progress Target

―

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

0

Graduation Rate

―

State Standard

―

Progress Target

―

White

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

64

Graduation Rate

98%

State Standard

80%

Progress Target

80%

Multiracial

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

0

Graduation Rate

―

State Standard

―

Progress Target

―

Students With Disabilities

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

4

Graduation Rate

―

State Standard

―

Progress Target

―

Limited English Proficient

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: ―

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

0

Graduation Rate

―

State Standard

―

Progress Target

―

Economically Disadvantaged

Met Graduation-Rate Criterion: YES

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

33

Graduation Rate

97%

State Standard

80%

Progress Target

78%

YES Graduation rate is equal to or greater than the State Standard or the group's Progress Target.
NO Graduation rate is less than the State Standard and the group's Progress Target.
― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Graduation Rates for Non-AYP Groups for Accountability

GROUP

Not American Indian or Alaska Native

Not Black or African American

Not Hispanic or Latino

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

Not White

Not Multiracial

General Education

English Proficient

Not Economically Disadvantaged

Male

Female

Migrant

Not Migrant

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

83

82

80

82

5

83

69

83

46

44

39

0

83

Graduation Rate

87%

87%

89%

87%

―

87%

93%

87%

96%

82%

92%

―

87%

Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

2011 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

65

65

64

65

1

65

61

65

32

35

30

0

65

Graduation Rate

98%

98%

98%

98%

―

98%

98%

98%

100%

97%

100%

―

98%

Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

Not American Indian or Alaska Native

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

83

Graduation Rate

87%

Not Black or African American

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

82

Graduation Rate

87%

Not Hispanic or Latino

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

80

Graduation Rate

89%

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

82

Graduation Rate

87%

Not White

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

5

Graduation Rate

―

Not Multiracial

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

83

Graduation Rate

87%

General Education

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

69

Graduation Rate

93%

English Proficient

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

83

Graduation Rate

87%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

46

Graduation Rate

96%

Male

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

44

Graduation Rate

82%

Female

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

39

Graduation Rate

92%

Migrant

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

0

Graduation Rate

―

Not Migrant

2012 Four-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

83

Graduation Rate

87%

Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

Not American Indian or Alaska Native

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

65

Graduation Rate

98%

Not Black or African American

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

65

Graduation Rate

98%

Not Hispanic or Latino

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

64

Graduation Rate

98%

Not Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

65

Graduation Rate

98%

Not White

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

1

Graduation Rate

―

Not Multiracial

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

65

Graduation Rate

98%

General Education

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

61

Graduation Rate

98%

English Proficient

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

65

Graduation Rate

98%

Not Economically Disadvantaged

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

32

Graduation Rate

100%

Male

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

35

Graduation Rate

97%

Female

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

30

Graduation Rate

100%

Migrant

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

0

Graduation Rate

―

Not Migrant

2011 Five-Year Graduation-Rate Total Cohort

65

Graduation Rate

98%

― There were fewer than 30 students in the cohort.

Graduation Rates for Regents with Advanced Designation and CTE Endorsement for Accountability

Percentage of 2012 Graduation-Rate Total Cohort members who graduated as of August 31, 2016 with:

Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)

19%

Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)

31%

Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide

NO

Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (This School)

19%

Regents Diploma with an Advanced Designation (Statewide)

31%

Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide

NO

Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This School)

20%

Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)

5%

Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide

YES

Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (This School)

20%

Regents Diploma with CTE Endorsement (Statewide)

5%

Percentage in This School Exceeded Statewide

YES

General Information

NYSED Homepage

EngageNY

FOIL

Twitter

Offices at NYSED

Information and Reporting Services

Special Education

Higher Education

Teacher and Principal Evaluation

Additional Information

Data Disclaimer

Login

Help

Subscribe to be notified when new data is added to this site:

What's your email address?
Don't fill field in:

© Copyright New York State Education Department, all rights reserved.

This document was created on: April 27, 2018, 11:16 am EST

Top

You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.

Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.